The Infona portal uses cookies, i.e. strings of text saved by a browser on the user's device. The portal can access those files and use them to remember the user's data, such as their chosen settings (screen view, interface language, etc.), or their login data. By using the Infona portal the user accepts automatic saving and using this information for portal operation purposes. More information on the subject can be found in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By closing this window the user confirms that they have read the information on cookie usage, and they accept the privacy policy and the way cookies are used by the portal. You can change the cookie settings in your browser.
BackgroundColorectal surgery is one of the most common procedures performed by general surgeons, with an increasing number being performed laparoscopically. Robotic technology is emerging in the ongoing evolution in minimally invasive surgery. This study systematically reviews the literature regarding the safety and feasibility of robotic‐assisted colorectal surgery.
MethodsA comprehensive search...
BackgroundThis systematic review evaluates the role of robotics in the surgical treatment of endometriosis.
MethodsElectronic database searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge for relevant studies over the past 10 years.
ResultsFour published articles were found that used robotic assisted laparoscopy to perform endometriosis surgery. All four studies used the da Vinci Surgical...
BackgroundWe hypothesized that robotic assistance (RARS) could provide better intraoperative and short‐term outcomes than a traditional laparoscopic approach (LARS) to rectal cancer surgery.
MethodsSystematic review of the literature, including electronic searches and communications to international robotic meetings. Inclusion criteria: studies involving rectal cancer patients and comparing outcomes...
BackgroundCurrently, hepatic resections are being performed with robotic‐assisted systems. There is little evidence regarding the outcomes of this surgical approach. This study aims to systematically review the outcomes related to robotic‐assisted hepatic resections.
MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases was completed. All human studies, limited to adults, published between 2000 to August...
BackgroundIt remains uncertain as to whether robotically assisted coronary bypass surgery (RACBS) is superior to non‐robotic procedures.
MethodsLiterature searches were conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. Two review authors independently screened citations, assessed trial quality and performed data extraction.
ResultsThree trials met the inclusion criteria. None was randomized. Compared with...
Background
The role of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) has never been investigated in large series.
Methods
A systematic literature review was carried out on PubMed and Cochrane libraries.
Results
We selected nine studies between 2008 and 2021. Two hundred sixty‐two patients were included. One hundred thirty‐one patients underwent simultaneous resections. The mean...
Background
We systematically reviewed the radiological outcomes of studies comparing robotic‐assisted (RA‐THA) and manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA).
Methods
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried from 1994‐2021 for articles comparing radiographic outcomes between RA‐THA and mTHA cohorts. A meta‐analysis was conducted whenever sufficient data was present for common outcomes...
Background
This systematic review aims to critically appraise the intraoperative use of augmented and mixed reality technology to improve surgical outcomes.
Method
A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP was performed in accordance with Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Results
This review...
Set the date range to filter the displayed results. You can set a starting date, ending date or both. You can enter the dates manually or choose them from the calendar.