BACKGROUND: In animal diets, methionine (Met) is considered to be the first limiting amino acid, and the activity of synthetic Met is typically added either as DL‐methionine (DLM) or as DL‐2‐hydroxy‐4‐methylthiobutanoic acid (HMTBA). It has been demonstrated that HMTBA exhibits a higher antioxidant capability in vitro as compared to DLM. However, the difference in antioxidant capability between DLM and HMTBA in vivo is unknown.
METHODS: In the present study, 60 male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into six groups and fed either a normal diet (NFD, 5.37% fat) or a high‐fat diet (HFD, 19.7% fat) in conjunction with 0.2% DLM, 0.2% HMTBA or 0.1% DLM and 0.1% HMTBA for 4 weeks.
RESULTS: HFD supplemented with 2% DLM and NFD with 2% HMTBA both induced adverse affects in relation to serum lipid parameters and depressed antioxidant defense systems in the digestive system. However, these changes were restored in the 0.2% HMTBA‐treated HFD group. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in the lipid parameters and antioxidant status in the NFD and HFD group supplemented with 0.1% DLM and 0.1% HMTBA.
CONCLUSION: HMTBA restored oxidative redox status under OS conditions and its antioxidant properties were positively correlated with the dosage included in diet. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry