Objectives
To compare an intact immunoradiometric parathyroid hormone assay with (1) a non‐isotopic technique; and, (2) a whole parathyroid hormone immunoradiometric assay.
Materials and Methods
Intact parathyroid hormone concentrations were measured using immunoradiometric (Scantibodies) and chemiluminescent (Immulite 2000) assays. Whole parathyroid hormone concentration was measured using an immunoradiometric assay (Scantibodies).
Results
A total of 48 and 47 samples, respectively, were used to compare immunoradiometric and chemiluminescent intact parathyroid concentrations and intact and whole parathyroid hormone concentrations by immunoradiometric assays. Using chemiluminescence, 39 (81.3%) samples had intact parathyroid hormone concentrations at or below the reported limit of detection of the assay (0.3 pmol/L). Intact [6.3 (2.0 to 95.5) pmol/L] and whole [3.3 (0.8 to 125.2) pmol/L] immunoradiometric parathyroid hormone concentrations exhibited excellent correlation.
Clinical Significance
Not all parathyroid hormone assays perform similarly. The chemiluminescent assay in this study cannot be recommended for use in dogs. The immunoradiometric intact parathyroid hormone assay proved to be a more reliable method. Given the correlation between intact and whole parathyroid hormone concentrations, it remains unclear which one is superior for routine clinical decision‐making.