Safety standards and guidelines for radio‐frequency exposure are being set based on whole‐body averaged SARs (WBA‐SARs) and localized average SARs. In Japan, the WBA‐SAR and 1 g localized average SAR are set at 0.4 W/kg and at 8 W/kg, respectively, except for the arms and legs and surface of body. The safety limits of WBA‐SARs were determined from observing the behavior destruction of animals for radio‐frequency exposure, but those of localized average SARs were determined under the assumption that a spatial peak SAR value does not exceed 20‐fold WBA‐SARs without their biological evidences. In this paper, to confirm whether or not the above assumption is valid, we calculated WBA‐SARs and voxel SARs in the frequency range from 50 MHz to 2 GHz in anatomical‐based human numerical models for pregnant woman and 3‐year‐child for vertically and horizontally polarized far‐field exposures, and derived the histogram and cumulative relative frequency of voxel SARs to obtain the quantitative relationship between WBA‐SARs and voxel SARs. As a result, we found that 99.90‐percentile voxel SARs are not exceeding 20‐fold WBA‐SARs, while 99.00‐percentile voxel SARs are smaller than 10‐fold WBA‐SARs in both human models.