The capacity of gated hosts for controlling a kinetic discrimination between stereoisomers is yet to be understood. To conduct corresponding studies, however, one needs to develop chiral, but modular and gated hosts. Accordingly, we used computational (RI‐BP86/TZVP//RI‐BP86/SV(P)) and experimental (NMR/CD/UV/Vis spectroscopy) methods to examine the transfer of chirality in gated baskets. We found that placing stereocenters of the same kind at the rim (R1=CH3, so‐called bottom) and/or top amide positions (R2=sec‐butyl) would direct the helical arrangement of the gates into a P or M propeller‐like orientation. With the assistance of 1H NMR spectroscopy, we quantified the intrinsic (thermodynamic) and constrictive (kinetic) binding affinities of (R)‐ and (S)‐1,2‐dibromopropane 5 toward baskets (S3b/P)‐2, (S3t/M)‐3, and (S3bt/P)‐4. Interestingly, each basket has a low (
≤1.3 kcal mol−1), but comparable (de<10 %) affinity for entrapping enantiomeric (R/S)‐5. In terms of the kinetics, basket (S3b/P)‐2, with a set of S stereocenters at the bottom and P arrangement of the gates, would capture (R)‐5 at a faster rate (kinR/kinS=2.0±0.2). Basket (S3t/M)‐3, with a set of S centers at the top and M arrangement of the gates, however, trapped (S)‐5 at a faster rate (kinR/kinS=0.30±0.05). In light of these findings, basket (S3bt/P)‐4, with a set of S stereocenters installed at both top and bottom sites along with a P disposition of the gates, was found to have a lower ability to differentiate between enantiomeric (R/S)‐5 (kinR/kinS=0.8). Evidently, the two sets of stereocenters in this “hybrid” host acted concurrently, each with the opposite effect on the entrapment kinetics. Gated baskets are hereby established to be a prototype for quantifying the kinetic discrimination of enantiomers through gating and elucidating the electronic/steric effects on the process.