Introduction
Introduction of robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionized the practice of Gynae oncology because of its usefulness in meticulous and precise dissection. The advantages of robotic approach include manual dexterity, wider range of motion with wristed instruments, filtration of hand tremor, ease of suturing, binocular three-dimensional vision, autonomy for the surgeon, better ergonomic control, better visualization and lesser fatigue, thus allowing surgeon to perform complex oncological operations with required precision. The main limitation of robotics is cost, availability and technical challenges. The purpose of this article is to assess the current state of robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology and to critically appraise the available literature.
Results
Robotic radical hysterectomy is safe and offers good oncological outcome in patients with carcinoma cervix. There is paucity of data regarding long-term outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomies. For carcinoma endometrium, robotic surgery is preferable to open surgery and is equivalent to laparoscopy in many respects and offers distinct advantages in morbidly obese population. The role of robotic surgery in ovarian cancer is not very clearly defined. In India, robotic-assisted surgery for cervical and endometrial cancer is developing.
Conclusion
Despite limitations with respect to cost-effectiveness and the institution of standardized training regimens persist, the evidence supports the emerging role of robotic-assisted surgery for the management of gynecologic malignancies. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology is promising.