In this paper, a novel approach to evaluating video temporal decomposition algorithms is presented. The evaluation measures typically used to this end are nonlinear combinations of precision-recall or coverage-overflow, which are not metrics and additionally possess undesirable properties, such as nonsymmetricity. To alleviate these drawbacks, we introduce a novel unidimensional measure that is proven to be metric and satisfies a number of qualitative prerequisites that previous measures do not. This measure is named differential edit distance (DED), since it can be seen as a variation of the well-known edit distance. After defining DED, we further introduce an algorithm that computes it in less than cubic time. Finally, DED is extensively compared with state-of-the-art measures, namely, the harmonic means (F-score) of precision-recall and coverage-overflow. The experiments include comparisons of qualitative properties, the time required for optimizing the parameters of scene segmentation algorithms with the help of these measures, and a user study gauging the agreement of these measures with the users' assessment of the segmentation results. The results confirm that the proposed measure is a unidimensional metric that is effective in evaluating scene segmentation techniques and in helping to optimize their parameters.