The detection of the types of local surface form deviations is a major step in the automated quality assessment of car body parts during the manufacturing process. In previous studies we compared the performance of different soft computing techniques for this purpose. We achieved promising results with regard to classification accuracy and interpretability of rule bases, even though the dataset was rather small, high dimensional and unbalanced. In this paper we reconsider the collection of training examples and their assignment to defect types by the quality experts. We attempt to minimize the uncertainty of the quality experts' subjective and error-prone labelling in order to achieve a higher reliability of the defect detection. We show that refined and more accurate classification models can be built on the basis of a preprocessed training set that is more consistent. Using a partially supervised learning strategy we can report improvements in classification accuracy.