The Infona portal uses cookies, i.e. strings of text saved by a browser on the user's device. The portal can access those files and use them to remember the user's data, such as their chosen settings (screen view, interface language, etc.), or their login data. By using the Infona portal the user accepts automatic saving and using this information for portal operation purposes. More information on the subject can be found in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By closing this window the user confirms that they have read the information on cookie usage, and they accept the privacy policy and the way cookies are used by the portal. You can change the cookie settings in your browser.
The Carnot cycle is reviewed as to its appropriateness to serve as the ideal model for geothermal binary power plants. It is shown that the Carnot cycle sets an unrealistically high upper limit on the thermal efficiency of these plants. A more useful model is the triangular (or trilateral) cycle because binary plants operating on geothermal hot water use a non-isothermal heat source. The triangular cycle imposes a lower upper bound on the thermal efficiency and serves as a more meaningful ideal cycle against which to measure the performance of real binary cycles. Carnot and triangular cycle efficiencies are contrasted and the thermal efficiencies of several actual binary cycles are weighed against those of the ideal triangular cycle to determine their relative efficiencies. It is found that actual binary plants can achieve relative efficiencies as high as 85%. The paper briefly discusses cycles using two-phase expanders that in principle come close to the ideal triangular cycle.