To assess long-term fracture risk after hysterectomy, with or without oophorectomy.Population-based, cohort study.Olmsted County, Minnesota.Women residing in Olmsted County (n = 9,258) who underwent hysterectomy in 1965–2002, compared to an equal number of age- and sex-matched community controls.Observational study of the effect of hysterectomy for various indications on subsequent fractures.Fractures of any type, and at osteoporotic sites (e.g., hip, spine, or wrist) alone, as assessed by electronic review of inpatient and outpatient diagnoses in the community.Compared with controls, there was a significant increase (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.29) in overall fracture risk among the women with a hysterectomy, but osteoporotic fracture risk was not elevated (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.98–1.22). Most hysterectomy indications were associated with fractures generally, although these were not often statistically significant. Only operations for a uterine prolapse were associated with osteoporotic fractures (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01–1.74). Oophorectomy was not an independent predictor of fracture risk (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.98–1.15).Hysterectomy does not appear to pose much long-term risk for fractures, but the association of fractures with surgery for uterine prolapse deserves further attention.