Objectives transfemoral endoluminal aortic management (TEAM) is technically feasible in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms but its advantage over conventional repair is unproved. We report our initial experience, learning curve and technical difficulties encountered during the process of establishing this novel technique in our institute. Material and Methods over a 3-year period 400 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysms were reviewed; only 58 cases (15%) were suitable for endovascular repair under our TEAM protocol and 36 (9%) were offered endovascular intervention. They were mainly high-risk patients (85% ASA III and IV) with a mean age of 72 years. Thirty-three bifurcated grafts, two straight tube grafts and one aorto mono-iliac graft were deployed. We oversized the graft by 15–20% to the diameter of the aortic neck and both common iliac arteries. Results two cases (6%–95% CI: 1–19%) had on-table conversion because of ruptured common iliac arteries. Peri-operatively there were two deaths from multi-organ failure. Transient renal failure occurred in two patients and three patients (9%) suffered a non-fatal myocardial infarction. Sixteen percent of patients had a groin wound problem. The mean hospital stay was 7 days. Five minor endoleaks (15%) were identified and sealed at 30 days. One secondary endoleak was identified at 18 months because of a patent juxta-renal lumbar artery. No secondary cuffs or extensions were used. Mean follow-up was 29 months and all grafts remained patent. The technical, clinical, continuous and secondary success rates were 78%, 91%, 89% and 91% respectively with TEAM. Conclusion endovascular training, patient selection and learning curve impose an impact on the final outcome. Until a reliable hard point is reached so that endovascular repair could be exercised in routine practice, the use of TEAM must be questioned in high-risk patients, and should be performed under clinical trial conditions using strict selection criteria.