This paper completes the case conference by commenting on similarities and differences among the four experts' suggestions and by reviewing what happened in the case after the sessions described in the initial case presentation. The response papers were in agreement on the need for palliative methods of anger management, functional analysis of anger attacks, and cognitive and behavioral techniques for reducing depression. They varied in the relative emphasis on depression versus anger as the primary treatment target, the conceptualization of anger, and the degree of emphasis on religion, SES, and race in relation to therapy process. Treatment outcome was mixed, and termination was in some ways premature, resulting at least in part from practical barriers to session attendance.