The paper presents results of two inter-related studies. The first comprises a microregional analysis restricted to three diagnostic sites (Chełmiczki 10, Karczyn 21/22, Olszewice 7). A systematic description of features and related artefacts from these sites paves the way to discussion on their function, chronology and topogenesis, making possible to define them as settlements. In case of Karczyn 21/22, the materials are dated to phases I and II of the Late Band Pottery Culture while the chronology of the other sites is linked to its phase III. The second analytical strand focuses on the geography of settlement. It aimed to relate the three sites to the spatial and cultural network of this culture. On the micro- and macroregional scale, the analysis attempts to investigate the rules of settlement location in relation to: (1) basic geomorphologic units, and (2) local hydrography. Future works on the ‘Late Band’ settlements need to address an interesting question of the relationships and dependencies between the Late Band Pottery culture and the cultural entities of the Middle and Late Neolithic (FBC, GAC). One has also to mention another important aspect of geographical methods in archaeology, as applied to settlement studies. It is a part of the research tradition advocating scientific approach to the settlement geography in archaeology. The approach is characterized by a systematic use of maps, graphs, tables, statistics and mathematical models that make possible to significantly improve our knowledge of differences in the spatial arrangement of the phenomena under investigation. However, this model has some shortcomings as it leaves aside certain important cultural variables. A behavioural or humanistic approach to the geography of settlement, makes possible to address a complexity of human motivation and grasp a social dimension of space.