Aims: There are many physical therapy options that can be recommended in management of epicondylitis. From a wide range of them we have chosen iontophoresis, phonophoresis and low frequency magnetic field. Our, goal was to compare the effectiveness of these three methods and to evaluate the effectiveness of applied treatment in terms of the functional skill's limitation, severity and frequency of pain. Material: The research was carried out on 55 patients of Rehabilitation Outpatient Unit at University Hospital in Krakow, treated for epicondylitis. The group consists of 45 females and 10 males, in the age of 37 to 79 years (54 years on average). Methods: The patients were assigned to: the iontophoresis group, the phonophoresis group and the low frequency magnetic field group. Two evaluations were performed, the first one before 10 therapeutic interventions and another one after completed series. The assessment included: the subjective evaluation of the pain severity as well as the pain frequency, the functional skill's limitation, the pain radiation, the Thompson's test, the Mill's test and the converse Cozen's test. Conclusions: All applied therapeutic modalities (iontophoresis, phonophoresis and low frequency magnetic field) were found to be effective on a very high level of significance. However there was no statistically significant difference between them. To conclude, physical therapy interventions offer benefits in epicondylitis and the methods can be used alternatively as none of them was superior to the rest.