Two amphiphilic regioisomers, 9‐AP (1‐[11‐(9‐anthracenylmethoxy)‐11‐oxoundecyl]pyridinium bromide), and 2‐AP (1‐[11‐(2‐anthracenyl methoxy)‐11‐oxoundecyl]pyridinium bromide), were synthesized and their assembly behaviors were studied. Due to the anisotropic features of the anthracene structure, different substituted positions on the anthracene ring lead 9‐AP and 2‐AP to adapt “shaver” and “spatula”‐like molecular shapes, respectively, which consequently dictate the structure of their final assemblies. While “shaver”‐shaped 9‐AP assembled into microsheets, driven by π–π interactions, “spatula”‐shaped 2‐AP assembled into microtubular structures, promoted primarily by charge‐transfer interactions.