# Journal of High Energy Physics

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-22

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-22

*N*-limit of this theory, discuss the OPE of two twist operators, and find various...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-18

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-62

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-22

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-38

*g*− 2 anomaly and give the correct dark matter relic abundance. These models fall into two general classes, whether or not the new fields couple to the Higgs. For the general structure of models without new Higgs couplings, we provide analytical expressions that only depend on the SU(2)

_{L}representation...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-33

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-18

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-40

*ρπ*, we calculate partial-wave amplitudes with

*J*≤ 3 and determine the degree of dynamical mixing between the coupled

*S*and

*D*-wave channels with

*J*

^{P}= 1

^{+}. The analysis makes use of the relationship...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-39

^{−1}. The underlying event activity is quantified in terms of the charged particle multiplicity,...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-27

*N*) gauge theories. The action consists of fermions localized on the loop and an Abelian gauge field that fixes the representation. The discussion is limited to weak coupling and Wilson loops in the fundamental representation extended along a smooth curve, but there are no restrictions on the matter content...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-14

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-24

*d*+ 1 dimensions involves two coupled CFT sectors constrained by residual

*d*-dimensional gravity. In the

*d*= 2 case, the gravitational constraints and the CFT spectrum are relatively tractable. We identify...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-56

*M*

_{3}in a

*G*

_{2}-holonomy manifold give rise to a 3d N=1 $$ \mathcal{N}=1 $$ supersymmetric gauge theory, TN=1M3 $$ {T}_{\mathcal{N}=1}\left[{M}_3\right] $$. We propose an N=1 $$ \mathcal{N}=1 $$ 3d-3d correspondence, based on two observables of these theories: the Witten index and the

*S*

^{3}-partition function. The Witten index of a 3d N=1 $$ \mathcal{N}=1...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-22

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-26

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-24

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-18

*W*

^{−}

*W*

^{+}

*W*

^{+}production, namely the production of a ℓ1−ℓ2+ℓ3+ν¯ℓ1νℓ2νℓ3 $$ {\ell}_1^{-}{\ell}_2^{+}{\ell}_3^{+}{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell_1}{\nu}_{\ell_2}{\nu}_{\ell_3}...

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-23

Journal of High Energy Physics > 2018 > 2018 > 7 > 1-17