-
[1] A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap, Entailment, vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1975).
-
[2] R. Balbes, P. Dwinger, Distributive Lattices, University of Missouri Press, Columbia (Missouri) (1974).
-
[3] N. D. Belnap, A useful four-valued logic, [in:] J. M. Dunn, G. Epstein (eds.), Modern uses of multiple-valued logic, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1977), pp. 8–37, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1161-7_2
-
[4] J. M. Dunn, Algebraic completeness results for R-mingle and its extensions, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 1–13, URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1183737028
-
[5] J. M. Dunn, Intuitive semantics for first-order-degree entailment and `coupled tree', Philosophical Studies, vol. 29 (1976), pp. 149–168, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31136-0_3
-
[6] J. Łoś, R. Suszko, Remarks on sentential logics, Indagationes Mathematicae, vol. 20 (1958), pp. 177–183, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1385-7258(58)50024-9
-
[7] A. I. Mal'cev, Algebraic systems, Springer Verlag, New York (1965), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65374-2
-
[8] G. Priest, The logic of paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 8 (1979), pp. 219–241, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00258428
-
[9] A. P. Pynko, Characterizing Belnap's logic via De Morgan's laws, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 41(4) (1995), pp. 442–454, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/malq.19950410403
-
[10] A. P. Pynko, On Priest's logic of paradox, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol. 5(2) (1995), pp. 219–225, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1995.10510856