To combat the large variability problem in resistive random access memory, current compliance elements are commonly used to limit the in-rush current during the forming operation. Regardless of the compliance element (1R-1R or 1T-1R), some degree of current overshoot is unavoidable. The peak value of the overshoot current is often used as a predictive metric of the filament characteristics and is linked to the parasitic capacitance of the test structure. The reported detrimental effects of higher parasitic capacitance seem to support this concept. However, this understanding is inconsistent with the recent successes of compliance-free ultrashort pulse forming which guarantees a maximum peak overshoot current. We use detailed circuit analysis and experimental measurements of 1R-1R and 1T-1R structures to show that the peak overshoot is independent of the parasitic capacitance while the overshoot duration is strongly dependent on the parasitic capacitance. Forming control can be achieved, in ultrashort pulse forming, since the overshoot duration is always less than the applied pulse duration. The demonstrated success of ultrashort pulse forming becomes easier to reconcile after identifying the importance of overshoot duration.