The Infona portal uses cookies, i.e. strings of text saved by a browser on the user's device. The portal can access those files and use them to remember the user's data, such as their chosen settings (screen view, interface language, etc.), or their login data. By using the Infona portal the user accepts automatic saving and using this information for portal operation purposes. More information on the subject can be found in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By closing this window the user confirms that they have read the information on cookie usage, and they accept the privacy policy and the way cookies are used by the portal. You can change the cookie settings in your browser.
Until the eighteenth century most European normative positions in moral philosophy presupposed strong motivational internalism. According to this assumption a belief about the good leads to action in accordance with it because the belief brings about a desire to act in this way or it is identical with this desire. Strong internalism is susceptible to fundamental difficulties. It cannot explain incontinence (the so-called weak will) or justify obligations for those who have not assented to (correct) beliefs about the good. An analysis of the 'Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals' and the 'Critique of Practical Reason' shows that Kant departed from strong internalism in favour of its weak version. Having drawn a clear line between facts and desires (the sphere of the empirical) on the one hand, and beliefs about the good (the sphere of the rational) on the other, Kant holds that a belief about the good does not necessarily lead to an appropriate action but may require a special motive. For this reason Kant distinguishes between facticity and normativity, and with a view to this purpose he analyses the concept of duty. This concept allows him to grasp the particular phenomenon of necessitation that is associated with beliefs about the good without presupposing that these beliefs will lead to actions that accord with them. In developing his conception of acting from duty Kant explains the possibility of both acting on beliefs about the good and of diverting from them. This 'discovery' of normativity has important consequences for moral theory and practice. Among other things, it requires a distinction between moral and other goods by identifying moral good with unconditional good.