× Close

The Infona portal uses cookies, i.e. strings of text saved by a browser on the user's device. The portal can access those files and use them to remember the user's data, such as their chosen settings (screen view, interface language, etc.), or their login data. By using the Infona portal the user accepts automatic saving and using this information for portal operation purposes. More information on the subject can be found in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. By closing this window the user confirms that they have read the information on cookie usage, and they accept the privacy policy and the way cookies are used by the portal. You can change the cookie settings in your browser.

Items from 1 to 10 out of 27 results
customise view
items per page:
Next

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York (First edition 1951).

  • Ballester, M. and Haeringer. G. (2011) A characterization of the single-peaked domain. Social Choice and Welfare 36, 305–322.

  • Bartholdi, J. and Orlin, J. (1991) Single transferable vote resists strategic voting. Social Choice and Welfare 6, 341–354.

  • Black, D. (1948) On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy 56, 23–34.

  • Brandt, F., Geist, C. and Peters, D. (2017) Optimal bounds for the no show paradox via SAT solving. Mathematical Social Sciences 90, 18–27.

  • Dryzek, J. S. and List, C. (2003) Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science 33, 1–28.

  • Dummett, M. and Farquharson, R. (1961) Stability of voting. Econometrica 29, 33–43.

  • Felsenthal, D. S. and Nurmi, H. (2017) Monotonicity Failures Affecting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate. Springer, Cham.

  • Felsenthal, D. S. and Nurmi, H. (2019) Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain. An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes. Springer, Cham.

  • Fishburn, P. C. and Brams, S. J. (1983) Paradoxes of preferential voting. Mathematics Magazine 56: 207–214.

Next