The author advances the thesis that the issue concerning decision making cannot be developed into a general, formalized theory. Reference is made to S. E. Toulmin's classification of arguments. Discrepancies between praxiology and ethics are pointed out
Financed by the National Centre for Research and Development under grant No. SP/I/1/77065/10 by the strategic scientific research and experimental development program:
SYNAT - “Interdisciplinary System for Interactive Scientific and Scientific-Technical Information”.