While still under the spell of Jacques Prévert's intriguingly unsophisticated 'Alicante', and in relentless pursuit of uncovering novel strategies for creating literary beauty, the authoress decided to subject the poem to a minute scrutiny in the hope of ferreting out the secret stuff 'holy simplicity' is made of. Much to her surprise, 'lurking' behind this 'sancta simplicitas' she found a fine network of complex patterns, each carefully designed to interact with the remainder in a flawless manner, thus considerably enhancing the potency of the ensemble. The following are several of the major patterns involved: dichotomous partition into sexuality and spirituality; colour-related symbolism; word play; dual-nature semantic pattern of keywords (signalling interweaving of libido-related and spirit-related zones); interplay of inherent and non-inherent readings of adjectives, of regular and irregular rhymes, or of verses with different-numbered feet (even and odd); effective intermingling of lexemes which synergetically appeal to four human senses. In the second phase, her research was steered away from fathoming the miracle of creating 'holy simplicity' towards investigating the sustained toil of recreating it in a different language: Romanian. The two subsections devoted to the topic in question submit to the reader Gellu Naum's translation of 'Alicante', and the one originating with none other than the authoress of this contribution respectively. A brief comparison of the two renditions has yielded the following points of dissimilarity: a) Naum's is a true-to-spirit translation, whereas the authoresses' has been created with the genius of the target language in mind. Herefrom stem the main contrasts listed below. b) Naum keeps on the fruit (Fr signifier orange, Rom signifier portocala), while she made so bold as to replace it by the equally exotic mango for reasons specified under III.2 below (s. also substitution of noptiera (= bedside table) and dormitory (= bedroom) for masa (Fr table) and pat (Fr lit) respectively. c) Naum completely disregards the pun in line 4, whereas she did not think twice about slightly modifying the rhythmic pattern in order to be able to render the former into Romanian. d) Likewise, Naum translates in utter defiance of the rhyming pattern, whereas to her observing it is a matter of prime importance. Needless to say, she is quite willing to take both the blame and the credit - if any - for the vast array of meanings she took the liberty to read into Prévert's poem, as well as for the translational licences resorted to in the hope of successfully putting these unique connotations across to the reader. The concluding section discusses still a further possibility of recreating Prévert's 'Alicante', namely by setting it to music. In this respect, Chuck Perrin's rendition has the added advantage of enhancing its lyricism, while concurrently taking the poem to that magical space hovering above the spiritual.
Financed by the National Centre for Research and Development under grant No. SP/I/1/77065/10 by the strategic scientific research and experimental development program:
SYNAT - “Interdisciplinary System for Interactive Scientific and Scientific-Technical Information”.